Changes at Boot Camp;
Compensating Variations
Changes at boot camp in the U.S. Army provide an excellent example [thanks to JohnH for the pointer; registration required]:
According to their detailed manual, drill sergeants may address recruits only as "soldier" or "private," or by surname. With few exceptions, they must ask before touching a recruit; the use of extra pushups as a "corrective action" remains common, but with limits. At the end of their nine weeks of initial basic training, recruits can discuss any complaints with the commander, whether about the food, the homework or the drills, in "sensing sessions."Lawsuits have probably contributed to the reduced hazing of recruits, but those changes could very well be endogenous to the economic changes.
Pretty poor conditioning for guys shipping out to Vietnam.Back in the mid 1960s, I worked as a research assistant at Kansas State University on a project to measure how long it took young men's body temperature to rise by 2 degrees (F) under various high temperature and high humidity conditions. We used soldiers from Fort Riley as test subjects, but they were soon shipped out to Vietnam, and so we hired a busload of unemployed young men from a nearby town to finish the tests.
The results were vastly different. The times for body temperatures to increase were much greater with the unemployed youth; soldiers' body temperatures rose much more quickly, ceteris paribus.We assumed the unemployed youth were goofing off, were different somehow, whatever. So we stopped using them and recruited students to be test subjects. Surprise: the students' physical responses were pretty much the same as the responses of the unemployed youth.
We surmised that the rigours of basic training were actually making the soldiers worse off, such that their body temperatures rose much faster than did the body temperatures of other young men when subjected to similar high temperature and high humidity environments.
<< Home